Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Open Letter to Pope Francis of the Catholic Church
Pope Francis’s New Tone Suggests an Age of Change Ahead
Since his papacy began in March, Pope Francis has shown himself to be a man of small but substantial gestures.
He exudes a pastoral charm -- whether cleaning the feet of prisoners, hugging a disabled child after easter Mass or picking up the phone to comfort the distraught -- that didn’t always come naturally to his predecessors. He dresses modestly, lives austerely, speaks constantly of the poor and drives a 1984 Renault.
He has reached out to atheists, gays and divorcees. In an interview released last week, Francis went further still. He affirmed his support for gays and lesbians, spoke candidly about his mistakes and doubts, and made clear that the Vatican, in his estimation, has fixated for far too long on a narrow set of controversial issues and “small-minded rules.”
“The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently,” he said. “We have to find a new balance; otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards.”
In describing that new balance, the pope’s language was suffused with ambiguity, uncertainty and doubt -- in other words, the language of reality. And perhaps most strikingly, he showed himself to be comfortable with change. “Human self-understanding changes with time and so also human consciousness deepens,” he said. “The view of the church’s teaching as a monolith to defend without nuance or different understandings is wrong.”
This is not the language one is accustomed to hearing from popes. Or from, say, the U.S. Congress. Yet it should resonate with other large and change-averse institutions that will soon be grappling with an era of unprecedented change.
To say that Francis is trying to appease “liberal” Catholics, or is conforming to any other ideological caricature, is to miss the point. He’s attempting to transcend the moribund and dispiriting language of the culture wars altogether, and to inject a note of seriousness and compassion into a public conversation saturated with triviality and invective. And he is grounding his arguments, in the best tradition of Catholic thought, in concern for the individual.
In doing so, Francis also makes a strong case that he, and by extension the church, has something to offer even increasingly secular societies. In the developing world, where some 70 percent of Catholics now live, the church is most visible in the network of social services it operates for the poor. In the rich world, in recent years, it has more often been the voice of reaction and sexual opprobrium. Francis is clearly trying to change that dynamic, to show that the church has more to offer.
We should hope he’s right. In an age of accelerating technological and social upheaval -- when everything from communications to economics to politics to the global climate is rapidly evolving -- a moral voice that is not only open to change but also attuned to the individual suffering and alienation that change can cause will grow ever more important.
Francis’s rhetoric implies no imminent revolution in church policies. Yet the Vatican is an organization of the long game. “Many think that changes and reforms can take place in a short time,” he said. “I believe that we always need time to lay the foundations for real, effective change.”
This is true, both in the church and in every other human institution. You may be disappointed that Francis hasn’t started officiating at gay weddings, or you may be furious that he’s opening a dialogue on issues his predecessors considered closed. You may not care at all. Whatever your view, however, Francis ought to be taken seriously. In the war of ideas, the papacy remains a singularly influential institution, and this pope is wielding his persuasive power in a new and vivifying way.
OPEN LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
My Dear Pope Francis,
The Philippines has financial limited resources and a high poverty rate. The rapid increase in population
has worsen as a problem. We have not sufficient resources to support the population, which leaves much fewer resources to improve the economy. Indeed, with more and great resources coming, we need only to abolish not poverty, but slavery. Millions of Filipinos are not enslaved because they are poor; on the contrary, they are poor because they are still enslaved.
Jesus, in the bible, admonished: "There is still one thing you haven't done," he told him. "Go and sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." Matt. 10:21. We Filipinos did not have to sell our possessions; it was taken away from us. We are now the poor. In fact, as the only followers of Jesus in all of Asia, we Filipinos suffer from poverty of the worst kind: the poverty of the mind and heart. We Filipinos have nothing in this world except to be with Jesus after death in the next world.
My dear Pope Francis, please be informed that among the very rich people in the Philippines are your Catholic priests, nuns, bishops, and Cardinals. They live not in the slums of our major cities, but reside in expensive condominiums, expensive villages, expensive mansions, and luxurious homes together with their respective wives and children, if not lovers or lived-in partners. No doubt, our congressmen and senators are among the wealthiest of Filipinos too, and the majority of them are faithful as Catholics.
Not one of them is an atheist.
Please, your eminence, please return the TRILLIONS OF PESOS the Catholic church made from the Catholic business corporations operating under tax-free privileges in the Philippines - monies made in the indulgence industry, real estate rentals, hospitals, farms, banks, schools, colleges, and universities - monies made yearly since the 16th century. Please give it back to the MILLIONS of economically impoverished Filipinos. In this way, You will not only insure the continued existence of the Catholic church in the Philippines, but will also earn the love, respect, and admiration of the billions of people in the non-Catholic countries. I, myself would once again believe that Catholicism is a great religion, and once again be faithful to the revealed truth that the Catholic church is not the historical curse, but the real Savior of the Filipinos in this only Catholic country in Asia today.
Thank you for your kind attention and consideration to this communication. I remain,
with all good wishes,
Poch Suzara, Atheist
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
What a bold straightforward letter addressed to the Bishop of Rome.
Who knows your desire would be granted? Carry on, Poch! -Bob Gabuna
Dear Poch:
Once in awhile your greatness as a person shines for all to see and feel the words
you used. Your humanity has proven that we are all brothers. You quoted His Holiness
Pope Francis with straightforward honesty and credibility. Whether you continue your atheism or not, I consider you my unseen friend and brother. I was touched by your letter to the Pope. Thank you so. Martin
NY, 25 September 2013
Poch:
It is possible that, perhaps, a Catholic priest, or one of the laity, will take the trouble of printing a hard copy of your open Letter to Pope Francis and send it by registered mail to him in the Vatican.
But I am not certain that this is going to happen.
Better yet, please make a hard copy of your Letter and send it by Registered Mail, with return card, to Pope Francis.
If this is what you do, and considering Pope Francis's present Mindset, there is a very good chance that: 1] He will get a chance to read it 2] Absorb what you say in it; and 3] Get sufficiently aroused about the condition of Filipino Catholics you describe so accurately that he will decide to do something about it.
You will do it, won't you?
If you do, thank you.
Have a nice day.
MarPatalinjug
I won't comment regarding the pope, who he is or what he does. I don't believe he is the vicar of Christ. He does not represent Bible believing Christians, and he most definitely does not represent me. Cheers.
Ken, in other words, no matter what, you will always be on the side of silly divinity, never on the side of humanity. Shame on you! Cheers! Poch Suzara
Post a Comment